QuantumBounds / CONCEPT
A traceless counterexample to the q-deformed commutator bound
Two traceless complex matrices of size five violate the proposed q-deformed commutator inequality at q = 2.
Closed
DIRECT PREREQUISITES1
DIRECT CONSEQUENCES0
PROOF DEPTH8
DOCUMENT LINKS1
A five-dimensional counterexample
RELATIONSHIP ATLAS
Every connection, in context.
Direct recorded relationships
Proof dependencyStructural affinityDocument link
Certified topology / UPSTREAM
Prerequisites
Certified topology / DOWNSTREAM
Consequences
None recorded in this release.
RELATED KNOWLEDGE
Structural connections
- A counterexample to the negative-q commutator boundstructural-affinity · Closed
- A supporting functional at every pure bipartite statestructural-affinity · Closed
- Input Information Balancestructural-affinity · Closed
- M-resistant qudit states exist in every admissible rangestructural-affinity · Closed
- Optimal quantum states depend on the Renyi ordersstructural-affinity · Closed
- Orthogonal Records and Pointer Informationstructural-affinity · Closed
- Pure-state ECQC fails in dimension fivestructural-affinity · Closed
- Selective LOCC can increase the Moreau-Yosida entanglement of formationstructural-affinity · Closed
Documents & exposition
Other authored & advisory relationships
None recorded in this release.
LIBRARY / RELEASE VERSIONS
Content history
Loading release versions...
Browse the archiveCertified provenance