RESEARCH / Focused target
Derivative signs of the power-weighted hyperbolic cotangent remainder
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/Analytic/CothBernoulliDegree/Result.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
Zhu, Completely monotonic integer degrees for a class of special functions, Conjecture 6.4:
Let m ≥ 1, n ≥ 2, and pₙ(t) be defined as (2.2). Then ((−1)ⁿ tᵐ pₙ(t))^{(m+2n−2)} > 0 holds for all t ∈ (0, ∞) and ((−1)ⁿ tᵐ pₙ(t))^{(m+2n−1)} > 0 is not true for all t ∈ (0, ∞).
Equation (2.2) is
$$p_n(t)=\frac{\coth t}{t} -\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{2^{2k}B_{2k}}{(2k)!}t^{2k-2}.$$
Put $P(t)=(-1)^nt^mp_n(t)$ and $M=m+2n$. The first clause is (6.12), and the failure of universal strict positivity in the second clause is (6.13).
Formal reading
All Lean names below have prefix D5.S3.Analytic.CothBernoulliDegree.
| Source object | Lean name | Correspondence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| $p_n(t)$ in (2.2) | Defs.p | The finite Bernoulli sum includes $k=0$ and $k=n$; its powers of $t$ are integer powers. |
| $P(t)=(-1)^nt^mp_n(t)$ | Defs.P | The sign and the natural power $t^m$ are retained. |
| Integers $m\ge1$, $n\ge2$ | Natural m, n with 1 ≤ m, 2 ≤ n | The domains coincide on the stated positive integer ranges. |
| $P^{(M-2)}(t)>0$ for all $t>0$ | First conjunct of Defs.claim | The derivative is iteratedDeriv (m + 2 * n - 2) (P m n). |
| $P^{(M-1)}(t)>0$ is not true for all $t>0$ | Second conjunct of Defs.claim | The universal strict positivity assertion is negated, with the same real argument domain. |
| Both clauses | Result.result | Exactly Defs.claim, with no additional hypothesis. |
The value assigned by real division and integer powers at zero is immaterial:
PartialFraction.hasSum_iteratedDeriv_P uses neighborhood agreement at each
positive argument to transfer all iterated derivatives.
Motivation
Our foothold
The settling declaration is D5/S3/Analytic/CothBernoulliDegree/Result.result.
The source note is D5/L/Asymptotics/zhu2020completelymonotonicdegrees.
The two consecutive derivative orders locate the loss of positivity for a
power-weighted Bernoulli remainder throughout the full integer parameter range.
Gap
Missing bridges
Status: Proved for all integers $m\ge1$, $n\ge2$ and all positive real arguments in (6.12). For (6.13), a single explicit positive argument, $t=5\pi/(m+2n)$, gives a strictly negative next derivative for each parameter pair.
Route
Proposed approach
The cotangent partial fractions at an imaginary argument, followed by finite geometric division and the even zeta values, give
$$P(t)=2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{t^M}{(\pi k)^{2n}(t^2+(\pi k)^2)},\qquad t>0.$$
On bounded real intervals, the quadratic reciprocal has derivative bound $|D^j(1/(t^2+a^2))|\le j!a^{-j-2}$. The product rule supplies locally uniform summable majorants for every derivative order. Hence the representation can be differentiated term by term at every positive argument.
For $a>0$, the rational kernel has certificates
$$D^N!\left[\frac{t^{N+2}}{t^2+a^2}\right] =N!\left(1-\operatorname{Re}(1+it/a)^{-N-1}\right),$$
$$D^{N+1}!\left[\frac{t^{N+2}}{t^2+a^2}\right] =\frac{(N+1)!}{a}(1+(t/a)^2)^{-(N+2)/2} \sin((N+2)\arctan(t/a)).$$
At $N=M-2$ the first certificate is strictly positive when $t>0$, since $|1+it/a|>1$. Every weighted summand is positive, which proves (6.12).
At $t=5\pi/M$, normalize the second derivative series by $2(M-1)!/\pi^{2n+1}$. The first term is at most $-1/8$, because
$$ (1+(5/M)^2)^{-M/2}\sin(M\arctan(5/M))\le-\frac18 \qquad(M\ge5).$$
The remaining terms sum to at most $\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}k^{-2n-1}\le1/16$. Multiplying back gives
$$P^{(M-1)}(5\pi/M)\le-\frac{(M-1)!}{8\pi^{2n+1}}<0,$$
which proves (6.13).
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
Integers $m\ge1$, $n\ge2$ and $t>0$ with $P^{(m+2n-2)}(t)\le0$ would contradict the first clause. A parameter pair in this range for which the next derivative were strictly positive at every positive argument would contradict the second clause. In particular, it would contradict the explicit bound at $5\pi/(m+2n)$.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
D5/S3/Analytic/CothBernoulliDegree/Result.result proves exactly Defs.claim.
Its principal dependencies are PartialFraction.P_eq_tsum,
PartialFraction.hasSum_iteratedDeriv_P, PartialFraction.iteratedDeriv_P,
Kernel.kernel_deriv_N, Kernel.kernel_deriv_N_pos,
Kernel.kernel_deriv_succ, Kernel.phase_bound and Kernel.tail_bound.
The private Result.negative_phase_sum and Result.negative_mixture combine
the negative first term with the tail estimate and restore the weighted scale.
The axiom closure of Result.result is
{propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound}.
The proof route was derived with the assistance of the ChatGPT Pro model. Mahmoud–Qi, Math. Inequal. Appl. 25(1) (2022), settle the related $m=1$ degree bounds for the remainder. Bouali, arXiv:2202.01801, treats $m=0$ or $n\in{0,1}$. No settlement of Conjecture 6.4 was found in the searched scope, which also includes Xu–Cen, Qi arXiv:2003.05300v2, Mahmoud–Qi arXiv:1912.07989v3, Bouali arXiv:2206.01527, Moustafa (2024), and Qi's bibliography (July 2026). This bounded scope does not establish exhaustive citation-index coverage or priority.
Triage
Scope assessment
- PROVED. Clause (6.12) holds for every integer $m\ge1$, $n\ge2$ and
every $t>0$, by
Result.result. - PROVED in prose. Clause (6.13) has the stronger bound
$P^{(M-1)}(5\pi/M)\le-(M-1)!/(8\pi^{2n+1})<0$, where $M=m+2n$.
The private
Result.negative_mixtureproves this bound for the weighted derivative series;PartialFraction.iteratedDeriv_Pidentifies that series with the derivative of $P$, as used inResult.result. - PROVED. The partial-fraction representation
$P(t)=2\sum_{k\ge1}(\pi k)^{-2n}t^M/(t^2+(\pi k)^2)$ for $t>0$
is
PartialFraction.P_eq_tsum. - COMPUTED. Evaluation at 120 decimal digits gives $P^{(M-1)}(5\pi/M)\approx-0.0169$ for $(m,n)=(1,2)$ and $\approx-0.949$ for $(m,n)=(3,2)$. These numerical evaluations are separate from the exact inequalities.
- OPEN. The exact completely monotonic degree of $t^mp_n(t)$ when it is not an integer is not determined here.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Exhaustive literature coverage, citation-index completeness and priority are unverified. The supplied bounded literature assessment has not been independently rechecked against remote sources; the formal statement and definitions are those displayed above.