trureturingGitHub MATHEMATICAL ATLAS

RESEARCH / Focused target

The exact A|BC constant of the GHZ measure

Literature status: not recheckedRepository record: proved

RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION

Research connections

0 released anchors
All source anchors (1)

Problem

The question

S. Wu, K. Zhong and J. Wu, “A measure for genuine tripartite entanglement”, arXiv:2605.02876v3, Section V.C, equation (37), state:

Numerically maximising E_GHZ over all biseparable A|BC states we find the sharp value sup_{ρ ∈ A|BC} E_GHZ(ρ) = ½, (37) attained e.g. by |0⟩_A ⊗ |Φ⁺⟩_BC and coinciding with the product-state value (34); the analytic proof of the exact constant 1/2 remains open. The same 1/2 holds for the B|AC and C|AB partitions by symmetry.

Issue #12719 preregisters the Tier 1 A|BC statement: every product of arbitrary density matrices has E_GHZ at most one half, and some such product attains one half. The specified class is exactly ρ_A tensor ρ_BC, including mixed factors.

Motivation

Our foothold

For a real direction n, the spin is n_x X + n_y Y + n_z Z. The encoding uses the existing Bloch matrix at trace parameter zero and vector 2n. Each pair of directions is Mathlib Orthonormal in the three-dimensional real Euclidean space. The observable is σ_a tensor (σ_b tensor σ_c), with complex matrix indices Fin 2 × (Fin 2 × Fin 2); its expectation is the real part of the matrix trace against ρ.

Equation (27) is Istar = E(a1,b1,c1) − E(a1,b2,c2) E(a2,b1,c2) E(a2,b2,c1). Equation (30) is one half the supremum of |Istar| over the three independent orthonormal pairs. claim asserts its universal product-density upper bound and existence of an attaining density product.

Gap

Missing bridges

The v3 source explicitly leaves the analytic proof of equation (37) open. The literature check in #12719 covers the arXiv versions and INSPIRE; Semantic Scholar and the mathematical conjecture corpora are search-seat reports. No settlement was found in that searched scope. This is a bounded literature reading, not an exhaustive priority claim.

Convexity, property (P6), is a separate assumption for bounds on mixtures across partitions. It is not a hypothesis of this product-density result and is not established by it.

Route

Proposed approach

Product expectations factor. Put u = E_A(a1), u′ = E_A(a2) and f_jk = E_BC(bj,ck). Then Istar = u f11 − u u′² f22 f12 f21. Variance of a real linear combination of anticommuting Hermitian involutions gives the squared-expectation bound. It supplies u² + u′² ≤ 1, f11² + f12² ≤ 1, f11² + f21² ≤ 1 and |f22| ≤ 1 on the same product state and the same BC density matrix.

With q = |u| and x = |f11|, these imply |Istar| ≤ q[x + (1−q²)(1−x²)] ≤ 1. When 1−q² ≤ 1/2 the bracket is at most one; otherwise q ≤ 3/4 and the bracket is at most 5/4, so their product is at most 15/16. The admissible-value set is nonempty and bounded, allowing csSup_le.

The existing zero-state and Bell density matrices, with frames (z,x), (x,z), (x,z), give u = 1, u′ = 0 and f11 = 1. le_csSup and the upper bound prove equality at one half.

Falsifier

What would falsify this route

A density product and three orthonormal pairs with |Istar| > 1 would contradict the upper bound. Absence of any attaining density product would contradict the sharpness clause. Both clauses are proved together.

Evidence

Evidence to collect

D5/S3/Quantum/Entanglement/GHZMeasureBiseparableBound.lean exposes the necessary definitions IsDensity, expect, observable, E, Istar, values, EGHZ, claim and the sole theorem result : claim. Its auxiliary facts are local proof terms, with no private theorem or forwarding declaration. The result has proof_shape: bind-only and escape_witness: none, under admission_basis: open-problem-resolution (#12719; Proved), as specified in the issue's proof-shape v2. The analytic bound and its exact attaining state have utility none: this is not a bounded enumeration, checker, numerical reduction or ordinary certified-instance delivery.

Triage

Scope assessment

Tier 1: an externally published, explicitly open analytic sharp-bound question. There is no digestion atom or coverage operation.

What the settlement shows

  • Proved within the result's derivation: on arbitrary density factors, the triple product in Istar carries u′². The two overlapping anticommuting pairs on the same BC state constrain |f12 f21| by 1−x². The resulting estimate q[x + (1−q²)(1−x²)] ≤ 1 is the decisive mechanism. No purity hypothesis is required on either factor. These are proof-internal facts, not separately exposed theorems.
  • Proved in this module: the bound is sharp and attained at |0⟩⟨0| tensor |Φ⁺⟩⟨Φ⁺|. The universal upper bound and the existential sharpness clause together give the A|BC supremum one half.
  • Open in this formalization: transport of the conclusion to B|AC and C|AB. The paper states those partitions follow by symmetry; this module contains no permutation-transport theorem.
  • Open: property (P6), convexity of E_GHZ, and the GME-witness use for mixtures across partitions. This product-density result does not discharge the source's conditional use of convexity.
  • Proved consequence for the source's estimate: the exact bound in equation (37) supersedes the coarser triangle estimate (36) for the specified A|BC products. It gives an analytic justification of that sharp product-density constant; other source conclusions depending on convexity remain conditional.
  • Open: E_GHZ ≤ 1/2 for all fully separable mixtures. A fully separable mixture need not be one A|BC density product, so that extension is not a consequence asserted by result.

ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED

Unverified assumptions

The search-seat citation counts and corpus checks are source-reported; the searched scope is not an exhaustive proof of novelty. Information-escape registration is paused under CLAUDE.md §3.9.

Dossier & anchor history

Loading release observations...