RESEARCH / Focused target
Tournament solid-metric lower bounds
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/Combinatorics/Graph/Walks/SolidResolvingTournament.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
Hakanen and Pavan, Solid-Resolving Sets on Directed Graphs, arXiv:2610.35041v1,
Conjecture 3.4, page 8, asserts that every tournament of orders
$6,7,8,9,10,11$ has solid-metric dimension at least $4,5,5,5,5,6$, respectively.
The source is recorded in Library/ConceptDynamics/hakanenpavan2026solid.md.
Preregistration: #22881.
Statement echo
| Source clause | Lean counterpart | Fidelity |
| --- | --- | --- |
| All tournaments of order $n$ | Every relation on Fin n satisfying the reused loopless exclusive-or IsTournament | No strong-connectivity or diameter hypothesis |
| Directed distance, including unreachable vertices | SolidResolvingTournamentBase.directedDistance, the extended-natural infimum of directed walk lengths | Deleting repeated-vertex cycles identifies the infimum with shortest-path length |
| Distance to a nonempty vertex set | SolidResolvingTournamentBase.distanceToSet, the infimum over its subtype | Infinity is retained when every member is unreachable |
| Definition 1.1, every nonempty $X\ne{v}$ | SolidResolvingTournamentBase.IsSolidResolving | Literal subset quantifier and inequality |
| Minimum solid-set cardinality | SolidResolvingTournamentBase.solidMetricDimension | Natural infimum; full-set solidity gives attainment |
| Orders $6,7,8,9,10,11$ and bounds $4,5,5,5,5,6$ | The six conjuncts of SolidResolvingTournament.claim, proved by result | No dropped clause or extra assumption |
The namespaces in this dossier have prefix D5.S3.Combinatorics.Graph.Walks.
All auxiliary profile hypotheses are discharged inside the settling proof.
Motivation
Our foothold
D5/S3/Combinatorics/Graph/Walks/SolidResolvingTournament.result proves the complete
six-part claim. The decisive mechanism bounds the number of outside vertices of a
solid landmark set by a chain cover of its constrained distance profiles.
Gap
Missing bridges
The source presents randomized searches in support of Conjecture 3.4. A uniform proof must handle every orientation, non-strong tournaments and infinite directed distances. A finite search at order six does not establish the remaining five bounds.
Route
Proposed approach
The literal solid predicate is equivalent to the ordered-pair strict-distance criterion. For a solid set, distinct outside vertices have incomparable profiles. Induced landmark tournaments of sizes three, four and five admit a complete finite classification. Directed-walk upper bounds impose the profile constraints; finite extended-natural reduction handles strong cases, and terminal singleton, triangle and four-vertex cases handle non-strong ones. Chain covers bound outside cardinality by one, two and five. Adding the landmark cardinality gives total-order bounds $3\mapsto4$, $4\mapsto6$, $5\mapsto10$. The general cardinality-to-dimension argument then gives the six claimed inequalities.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A loopless tournament on one of the six specified finite vertex types with a solid
set smaller than the corresponding claimed bound contradicts result. A profile
outside the certified covers, a missed induced tournament type, or an invalid
infinite-distance reduction would falsify a required intermediate argument.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The four modules are SolidResolvingTournamentBase, SolidResolvingTournamentProfiles,
SolidResolvingTournamentTerminal and SolidResolvingTournament in
D5/S3/Combinatorics/Graph/Walks/. Their Scribes display every public declaration.
The sole resolution claim is Proved on the settling result.
The escape audit is unfinished for all 47 public theorems and lemmas: #23622. The missing source-law reconstruction, whole-family variation, role/anchor sensitivity and observational-dependence proofs prevent a faithful four-slot registration. No registration is claimed validated.
Independent computation
The experiment is the immutable experiment directory.
Its check.py has SHA-256
948610b5a86963b2ff1ace02aea969decf707f78f47e707ca341f8453d5c4736.
The exact script extracted from that commit was executed with
python3 /tmp/op-solidtour/check-rework.py, exit 0,
with final result ALL_CHECKS_OK.
It checks all labelled landmark tournaments of sizes three, four and five;
strong-profile covers and non-strong terminal cases; literal versus ordered solidity
through order four; and all $32768$ labelled tournaments at order six. The order-six
dimension histogram is ${4:1440,5:21984,6:9344}$.
It does not enumerate all tournaments at orders seven through eleven and is not
Lean evidence for their universal bounds.
Triage
Scope assessment
| Item | Status | Evidence kind and scope |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Arbitrary-order landmark bounds $3\mapsto4$, $4\mapsto6$, $5\mapsto10$ | proved | Kernel-checked private SolidResolvingTournament.landmark_bound_3, landmark_bound_4, landmark_bound_5; arbitrary finite ambient vertex type |
| Literal solid definition and ordered-pair criterion | proved | Kernel-checked SolidResolvingTournamentBase.solid_iff_ordered; the definition retains every nonempty subset |
| General path upper bounds, finite ENat reduction, terminal singleton/triangle/four-component profile bounds, conditional six-part assembly | proved | Kernel-checked SolidResolvingTournamentBase.directedDistance_le_walkBound, SolidResolvingTournamentProfiles.profile_finite_bound, SolidResolvingTournamentTerminal.nonstrong_profile_bound_*, strong_enat_profile_bound, and private SolidResolvingTournament.claim_of_card_bounds |
| Six universal lower bounds | proved | Kernel-checked SolidResolvingTournament.result with all six conjuncts |
| Independent checker | computed | The immutable script, command, exit code and SHA-256 above; exact tested scope only |
| Sharpness at arbitrary orders and other landmark sizes | open | No general sharpness or other-landmark-size theorem is asserted |
What the settlement shows
The constrained-profile and chain-cover argument proves the landmark bounds for arbitrary ambient order, rather than only for the six conjectured orders. It includes infinite distances and non-strong orientations. The full six-part assertion of Conjecture 3.4 is proved; randomized evidence is unnecessary for these lower bounds. The order-six computation separately verifies attainment of bound four at that order. General sharpness, the arbitrary-order minimum and existence of every intermediate dimension remain open here. The bounded source reading identifies no additional theorem requiring a new conclusion from this settlement; a complete literature dependency analysis is unverified.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Literature completeness is ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED. The preregistration records a partial
screen of the versioned source, arXiv metadata, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex,
MathOverflow, Zenodo, public Lean settlements and repository results. No settlement
was located in that searched scope. Rate-limited citation services, inaccessible
older full texts, the conference full text and a complete citation graph are outside
the verified reading. No claim of worldwide priority or exhaustive novelty is made.