RESEARCH / Focused target
The A084068 Pell gcd conjecture
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- Pell and Companion Pell GcdReleased anchor
Problem
The question
Joseph A. Stocke's July 28, 2025 conjecture in OEIS A084068 states
A084068(n) = gcd(A001108(n), A001109(n)) for every n at least one.
The entry still labels this formula a conjecture when inspected on
September 8, 2026.
Motivation
Our foothold
This is a first-tier recent OEIS conjecture. Define Pell numbers P by P(0)=0, P(1)=1 and companion Pell numbers Q by Q(0)=Q(1)=1, both with R(n+2)=2R(n+1)+R(n). The three OEIS entries explicitly identify the conjecture with the parity-dependent gcd formula proved in the module.
Gap
Missing bridges
The implementation brief reports no independent published proof in its searched public indexes. The missing argument is that P(n) and Q(n) are coprime and Q(n) is odd for every index.
Route
Proposed approach
Induction converts the second-order recurrences into P(n+1)=P(n)+Q(n), Q(n+1)=2P(n)+Q(n). This step preserves coprimality, because gcd(p+q,2p+q)=gcd(q,p), and preserves oddness of Q.
For even n, gcd(2P(n)^2,P(n)Q(n)) equals P(n)*gcd(2P(n),Q(n))=P(n). Oddness makes Q(n) coprime to 2, so coprimality with P(n) implies coprimality with 2P(n). For odd n, gcd(Q(n)^2,P(n)Q(n)) equals Q(n)*gcd(Q(n),P(n))=Q(n).
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A positive index at which the normalized gcd differs from P(n) on the even branch or Q(n) on the odd branch would contradict the theorem.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
- Lean module:
D5/S1/Recurrence/PellCompanionGcd.lean. - Public theorem:
pell_companion_gcd; it also holds at index zero. - The source formulas were directly checked on all three OEIS pages;
bibliographic details are in
Library/Arith/oeis2025a084068.md. - The formal result is unbounded in n; finite experiments are not its proof.
Triage
Scope assessment
theorem. The normalized universal assertion has a formal proof. The
other A084068 conjecture concerning A348295 is outside this result.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
First-publication priority is not established. The brief's absence-of-proof search did not exhaust private or unindexed literature. The external OEIS identifications were checked by reading the pages; they are not formal theorems about the website. No claim of exhaustive literature search is made.