RESEARCH / Focused target
The A005590 zero set at multiples of three is characterized
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- Stephan's A005590 Zero-Set CharacterizationReleased anchor
Problem
The question
OEIS A005590, NAME (%N, verbatim):
a(0) = 0, a(1) = 1, a(2n) = a(n), a(2n+1) = a(n+1) - a(n).
Ralf Stephan's FORMULA conjecture (%F, verbatim):
Conjecture: a(3n)=0 iff n in A003714. - Ralf Stephan, May 02 2003
OEIS A003714, NAME (%N, verbatim):
Fibbinary numbers: if n = F(i1) + F(i2) + ... + F(ik) is the Zeckendorf representation of n (i.e., write n in Fibonacci number system) then a(n) = 2^(i1 - 2) + 2^(i2 - 2) + ... + 2^(ik - 2). Also numbers whose binary representation contains no two adjacent 1's.
The literal proved statement is ∀ n, r(3n)=0 ↔ No11 n, rendered in Lean as
∀ n : ℕ, r (3 * n) = 0 ↔ No11 n, where r : ℕ → ℤ satisfies r(0)=0,
r(1)=1, r(2n)=r(n), and r(2n+1)=r(n+1)-r(n), and where
No11(n) := ∀ j : ℕ, (n >>> j) % 4 ≠ 3. The growth rate attributed to
Reznick and the partial recurrences recorded by Chai Wah Wu are NOT claimed.
Motivation
Our foothold
The OEIS entry has recorded Stephan's zero-set equivalence as a conjecture since 2003. Identifying its zeros with A003714 connects the signed recurrence to the standard binary language with no adjacent one bits.
Gap
Missing bridges
The checked A005590 entry still labels the zero-set equivalence "Conjecture", and the checked revision history contains no settlement. Reznick's 1985 paper addresses continued-fraction extremal behavior, Allouche and Shallit develop the general theory of regular sequences, and Chai Wah Wu's 2016 contribution records partial recurrences; none of those checked sources gives this complete zero-set classification. Exact searches of arXiv and MathOverflow returned no matching result. OpenAlex's exact combined phrase search, Crossref's exact identifier search, and GitHub's exact conjecture-phrase search also returned zero matches on 2026-09-14. These checked surfaces do not support a publication priority claim.
Route
Proposed approach
- Strong induction proves the adjacent-pair invariant
I(x,y) = x(x-y):(r(n),r(n+1)) ≠ (0,0)and0 ≤ r(n) * (r(n)-r(n+1)). - For
Z(n) := (r(3n)=0), the defining equations and invariant giveZ(2m) ↔ Z(m),Z(4m+1) ↔ Z(m), and¬Z(4m+3). - The low two bits give the same add-a-bit recurrences for
No11. - Strong induction on
ncombines the even,4m+1, and4m+3cases.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A natural number n for which exactly one of r(3n)=0 and No11(n) holds
would contradict the theorem. The kernel-checked result quantifies over every
natural number.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
- Lean module:
D5/S1/Recurrence/StephanA005590ZeroSetCharacterization.lean. - Main theorem:
result, with std3 axiom closure[propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]. - Kernel profile on this worktree: wall time 3.82 seconds, type checking 190 milliseconds, and maximum resident set size 1,501,675,520 bytes.
- The orchestrator independently found zero mismatches between
r(3n)=0andNo11(n)on[0,20000], and checked the adjacent-pair invariant on[0,5000]. - The bounded checks support fault detection only; the Lean induction carries the universal proof.
Triage
Scope assessment
theorem. Stephan's stated equivalence is proved for every natural number
under the literal A005590 recurrence and the binary no-adjacent-ones predicate.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The bounded scans do not establish the universal statement. Historical openness outside the checked OEIS history, arXiv, MathOverflow, OpenAlex, Crossref, GitHub, and cited-source surfaces is unverified; no exhaustive literature or priority claim is made.