RESEARCH / Focused target
The Rule 84 center column modulo three
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/CellularAutomata/Rule84ModThreeCenterColumn.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
Tigran Nersissian, Diagonal Bases and Diagonal Periods of Elementary Cellular Automata, arXiv:2609.25078v1, Remark 6, page 12, states:
(The outstanding Rule 84 case) The polynomial of Rule 84 is (a + b + ab)(1 + c). Modulo three, its center column begins 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, … and follows the repeating block (1, 2, 2) after the first entry for the tested times 0 ≤ t < 2048. All center values are also units modulo 9 and 27 on that range, as Corollary 2 predicts. An all-time proof of the observed pattern is not supplied here. If Rule 84 is universal modulo three, it is universal at every power of three; three could not be the sole exceptional modulus.
Section 19, page 42, states:
The classification reduces the remaining single-seed universality question to the eight rules in E at odd primes. The observed Rule 84 pattern modulo three requires an invariant or an all-time recurrence proof. A finite nonzero prefix is insufficient.
This dossier anchors exactly that all-time pattern. Definition 1, page 4,
fixes the canonical positive-coefficient polynomial lift and the synchronous
integer-lattice orbit. For the modulus 3 and the single seed at zero, let
A 0 x = if x = 0 then 1 else 0 and
A (t+1) x = (a+b+a*b)*(1+c), where
a = A t (x-1), b = A t x and c = A t (x+1) in ZMod 3.
The statement is
A 0 0 = 1 ∧ ∀ s : ℕ, A (3*s+1) 0 = 1 ∧ A (3*s+2) 0 = 2 ∧ A (3*s+3) 0 = 2.
It includes every natural time, with no time cutoff or extra hypothesis.
Motivation
Our foothold
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/CellularAutomata/Rule84ModThreeCenterColumn.result
proves the displayed pattern. Nonzero center values give the unit condition
needed by the source's all-window diagonal-basis universality criterion.
Universality here means unique coordinates for every finite target vector
in the diagonal family, as in the source; it is separate from computational
universality of the full automaton dynamics.
Gap
Missing bridges
Remark 6 supplies only a finite prefix and explicitly omits an all-time
proof. The preregistration in issue #12485 contains the quantified claim,
the finite invariant languages and the literature check before the Lean
probe. The checked v1 text, the companion arXiv:2609.25077, and the MathDB
queries recorded in #12485 supply no proof of this statement.
Repository and pinned Mathlib searches find no prior matching settlement:
not-found-in-searched-scope. This bounded check makes no worldwide
priority claim.
Route
Proposed approach
The half-plane x < 0 remains zero by induction, since
(0+0+0*0)*(1+c) = 0. For positive time t, every length-seven window
starting at x ≥ -5 belongs to a finite language indexed by t mod 3.
The phase languages have sizes 35, 37 and 38 and share 31 words.
The window at x = -5 is 0000021, 0000011 or 0000020 at phases
0, 1 or 2, respectively.
Every compatible length-nine word, whose three overlapping length-seven windows belong to one phase language, maps under the local rule to a length-seven word in the successor language. The boundary update uses the proved zero left input and membership of the actual neighboring window to constrain its right input. Kernel-checked finite closure certificates and the time-one base establish the invariant by unbounded induction. The sixth letter of the boundary window is the center value.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
An incorrect certificate would give a compatible length-nine word whose image is outside the next language, or a boundary word with an admissible right extension that fails to map to the next boundary word. A time with center value different from the displayed three-phase pattern would contradict the settling theorem.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The canonical source is
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/CellularAutomata/Rule84ModThreeCenterColumn.lean.
Its public surface is A, claim and result; the two private theorems
are zero_left and invariant_all. The bulk and boundary certificates use
decide +kernel inside the live induction. The result has only the
standard axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound.
The mathematical truth is carried by the Lean declarations and their
kernel-checked proof terms. Prime-power transfer and the source's
diagonal-basis criterion are not additional Lean declarations here.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named open problem, preregistered in #12485.
admission_basis: open-problem-resolution; proof_shape: content for
result, zero_left and invariant_all. The escape witness is the
all-time window-language invariant. Utility is none: the mathematical
conclusion is unbounded in time; the finite certificates support that
induction and are not separately delivered positive finite instances.
What the settlement shows
- Proved in this module: the three-phase length-seven language and
distinguished boundary word are forward invariant from time 1. The
private
invariant_allestablishes this and is used by the public GIDD5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/CellularAutomata/Rule84ModThreeCenterColumn.result. The zero half-plane supplies the boundary input; overlapping actual windows supply compatible bulk inputs. No finite time observation is used as a premise of the all-time conclusion. - Proved in this module: the center column is 1 at time zero and
repeats
(1, 2, 2)from time 1 onward. The result covers the fixed canonical lift, modulus 3 and single seed; it does not assert a pattern for another modulus or seed, or a minimal period for the entire orbit. - Proved consequence using source results, not separately formalized
here: for each integer
a ≥ 1, every center value of the canonical single-seed orbit modulo3^ais a unit, and its diagonal basis is universal for every finite window length. Polynomial reduction identifies its reduction modulo 3 with the orbit proved here, whose center value is always 1 or 2. Divisibility by 3 is therefore excluded at every time. The identityp84(0,0,c)=0gives triangularity; the source's Corollary 1 then gives universality, and Corollary 2 transfers the prime case to every positive power. This removes the all-time Rule 84/modulo-three gap in Remark 6 and Section 19. It does not assert that the higher-power center sequence has period three. - Open: the remaining odd-prime cases of the source's eight-rule family E, including Rule 84 at odd primes other than 3. The modulus-3 certificate does not give a certificate at a different prime.
- Open: extensions to other initial seeds, minimal window-language size, and exact center periods at higher powers of 3. The argument provides no classification or sharpness statement for these questions.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The bounded literature search does not establish exhaustive worldwide novelty, priority or absence of an independent proof. The source's Corollaries 1–2 are literature results and are not kernel-checked in this module. Other seeds and moduli remain outside its formal statement.