RESEARCH / Focused target
Mathar's Conjecture 1 on two non-bonding dominoes
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/HardCore/NonBondingDominoPairs.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
R. J. Mathar (arXiv:2404.18806, 2024) counts placements of dominoes on an
r × c board that are non-bonding: every square of one is at L1 distance at
least 2 from every square of another. They are hard dimers with
nearest-neighbour exclusion. His Conjecture 1 (equation (21)) reads:
D(r,c,2) = 2c²r² − 2(cr² + c²r) + ½(r² + c²) − 22cr + (59/2)(c + r) − 30; r, c ≥ 3.
Issue #11068 fixes the reading. A domino is a set of two board squares at L1
distance 1, and D(r, c, 2) counts the sets of two pairwise non-bonding
dominoes. The identity holds in ℚ for all r, c ≥ 3.
Motivation
Our foothold
The paper left the formula as a conjecture from its transfer-matrix tables.
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/HardCore/NonBondingDominoPairs.result proves it
for all r, c ≥ 3.
Gap
Missing bridges
Issue #11068 preregisters the proof route and the literature check. arXiv has
only version 1 and no later paper, Semantic Scholar lists no citation, and the
OEIS has no entry for the rows. not-found-in-searched-scope.
Route
Proposed approach
- Every domino is horizontal or vertical and is determined by its anchor square.
- Two distinct dominoes bond exactly when the offset of their anchors lies in
a finite list:
- 11 offsets for equal orientations, the equal domino included;
- 12 offsets for mixed orientations.
- The ordered anchor pairs with a given offset form a product of two interval
overlaps. For
r, c ≥ 3each overlap is linear inror inc. - Twice
D(r, c, 2)is the number of ordered non-bonding pairs:N²minus the 46 offset classes, whereN = r(c − 1) + (r − 1)c. Summing gives the polynomial.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
The proof would fail if a bonded offset were missing from the lists of step 2,
or if an overlap of step 3 were not linear for some r, c ≥ 3.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
Brute force from the literal definition (#11068):
- the formula matches for all
3 ≤ r, c ≤ 10; - it fails for every tested board with
r ≤ 2orc ≤ 2; - replacing the constant term
−30by−29matches none of the 36 boards with3 ≤ r, c ≤ 8.
The canonical source is
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/HardCore/NonBondingDominoPairs.lean. Its public
declarations are IsDomino, NonBonding, D2, claim, and result.
- Frozen module statement identity:
sha256:f57332fcc4ec0c999803dfb6462e0d206bf0394329542d85010d8b9462d2eadd. - Result declaration statement identity:
sha256:9585653f22b4f09cf7b60c60161fab403e11db0867867aec7dc9b02e3747fdae. - Freeze event:
sha256:39e23454011ce8257a8f38c9c198c58c5074bdba412f9192c5c6f51b726ac9cb.
It has no project-level frozen prerequisite. The proof uses only the standard
axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; no sorry,
native_decide, or new axiom.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named conjecture (2024 paper), preregistered in issue #11068
before any Lean. theorem; resolution proved. The public theorem has
proof_shape: content. The anchor bijection, the bond-offset classification
and the overlap counts are new propositions on its live path. Admission basis
open-problem-resolution; utility none.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The bounded literature check does not establish exhaustive worldwide novelty, priority, or the absence of an independent proof.