RESEARCH / Focused target
Mathar's recurrence for OEIS A113409
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S1/Recurrence/MatharCentralBinomialTransformRecurrence.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
OEIS A113409 is named "A transform of the central binomial coefficients A001405." Its FORMULA field defines the sequence literally:
a(n) = Sum_{k=0..floor(n/2)} C(n-k, k)*C(k, floor(k/2)).
The conjecture in the same field is:
Conjecture: (n+2)a(n)-2(n+1)a(n-1) +(n-4)a(n-2) +2a(n-3) +4(2-n)*a(n-4)=0. - R. J. Mathar, Nov 07 2012
Preregistration issue #13334 fixes the nonnegative-index domain: every natural
n >= 4. The binomial sum and its indices are natural numbers; the displayed
recurrence is evaluated in the integers. Its statement is claim, and
D5/S1/Recurrence/MatharCentralBinomialTransformRecurrence.result proves it.
Motivation
Our foothold
The recurrence gives an unbounded exact relation among five consecutive values of the sequence defined by the source sum.
Gap
Missing bridges
Issue #13334 records a tier-1 formula-field conjecture and a bounded literature
search: the candidate search seat reports no proof in arXiv, MathDB, or
google-deepmind/formal-conjectures. The recorded OEIS source has the conjecture label and literal formula.
These readings establish
not-found-in-searched-scope, without an exhaustive novelty or priority claim.
Route
Proposed approach
Write b(k) = C(k, floor(k/2)) and extend the triangular transform to
T_b(n) = sum_{k=0..n} C(n-k,k)b(k); the added terms vanish. Pascal's identity
and its weighted version control T_c and
W_c(n) = sum_{k=0..n} k C(n-k,k)c(k) for arbitrary integer-valued c.
The even and odd expressions for b reduce its two-step recurrence to the
central-binomial recurrence. Transforming that relation and eliminating the
shifted weighted sums produces the successive difference of the desired
five-term expression. Its value at zero is zero, and induction proves the
expression is zero at every forward-shifted index. The vanishing tail then
identifies T_b with the literal source sequence.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A natural n >= 4 whose literal binomial sum violates the displayed integer
recurrence would contradict result.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The canonical mathematical source is
D5/S1/Recurrence/MatharCentralBinomialTransformRecurrence.lean.
Its public surface consists of a, claim, and result : claim; every
auxiliary proposition is a local proof term inside result.
The corresponding Blueprint describes all three declarations and attaches a
Proved resolution claim to result.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named conjecture, preregistered in #13334.
admission_basis: open-problem-resolution (#13334; Proved); utility none.
What the settlement shows
- Proved in
D5/S1/Recurrence/MatharCentralBinomialTransformRecurrence.result: the exact recurrence holds for every naturaln >= 4, with no additional hypothesis on the sequence defined by the source sum. The decisive mechanism is the elimination of the weighted transform followed by induction in the localtr_recurrenceproof. - Proved inside that result: the transform extension has a vanishing tail, and its weighted Pascal identities supply the difference relation used by the induction. These local identities describe the argument's scope; they are not separate exported settlement theorems.
- Computed: the literal sum equals the OEIS data for every
0 <= n < 20(20 exact integer matches), using the fetched b-filehttps://oeis.org/A113409/b113409.txt. - Computed: the displayed recurrence residual is zero for every
4 <= n < 40(36 exact integer residuals), evaluated on the literal sum. Both computations usepython3 /Users/auric/.sshx/86bc0b314415216d22d436a5/attempt-1/check-a113409.py, exit 0; script SHA-256f9b2d9148205cf8880fe2613013bd47616f619d565338ec8993b39011ba92376. These finite checks do not establish an unbounded statement. - Open to kernel verification in this delivery (derived, not kernel-verified):
the generating-function equation
HY² = V²from #13334. Its definitions areG(x) = sum_{n>=0} a(n)x^n,H = 1-2x+x²-4x⁴,V = 1-x+2x², andY = 1+2x²G. The issue derives the equation by substitutingw = x²/(1-x)into(1-4w²)(2wB(w)+1)² = (1+2w)², whereB(w) = sum_{k>=0} C(k, floor(k/2))w^kandG(x) = (1-x)⁻¹B(x²/(1-x)). This is the issue's generating-function derivation, not a consequence kernel-verified byresult. - Open in this delivery: Kotesovec's asymptotic
a(n) ~ 2^(n+3/2)/sqrt(3πn), as stated in the OEIS A113409 FORMULA field and attributed there to Vaclav Kotesovec. The deliveredresultsupplies no proof of this asymptotic. - Open: an extension below index four requires a specified convention for negative sequence indices. This module proves no dependency from the recurrence to other source results and settles no additional named conjecture.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Worldwide novelty, publication priority, and the absence of an independent proof outside the recorded literature-search scope are unverified. A direct source request returned HTTP 403; source fidelity is supported by the preregistration and the recorded successful OEIS source verification.