RESEARCH / Focused target
A bound on n² times a falling factorial
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/FallingFactorialMomentBound.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
T. A. Malik and R. Lopez-Mobilia (arXiv:2004.07168, cond-mat.stat-mech) define an entropy through the number of samples needed to see a repeated microstate. After eq. (003.21) they state:
Conjecture. (n²/k') (1/k')^n k'!/(k'−n)! ≤ 1 for integer n ∈ [0, k'].
with "We have not found a proof for this conjecture. However, we have analyzed
it numerically and it seems to hold." Issue #11361 fixes the reading: for every
integer k ≥ 1 and every integer 0 ≤ n ≤ k, equivalently
n² · k(k − 1)⋯(k − n + 1) ≤ k^{n+1}.
Motivation
Our foothold
The bound gives the corollary h(k') ∈ (1/k', k') for the sum h of
eq. (003.21), which the paper uses to estimate its entropy for black holes. The
frozen declaration D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/FallingFactorialMomentBound.result
proves the conjecture for all k ≥ 1 and 0 ≤ n ≤ k; the corollary and its use
are not formalized.
Gap
Missing bridges
Issue #11361 preregisters the reading, the route and the literature check. The
paper has one arXiv version and no journal reference; INSPIRE lists no citing
record. The product estimate ∏(1 − i/k) ≤ e^{−n(n−1)/2k} is the standard
birthday-problem bound; no source found states this inequality.
These readings are not-found-in-searched-scope; they do not establish an
exhaustive worldwide literature search, priority, or the absence of an
independent answer.
Route
Proposed approach
- For
n ≤ 3the inequality is a polynomial one:4(k − 1) ≤ k²forn = 2, andk⁴ − 9k(k − 1)(k − 2) = k((k − 3)³ + 9) ≥ 0forn = 3. - For
n ≥ 4,k(k − 1)⋯(k − n + 1) = k^n ∏_{i<n}(1 − i/k) ≤ k^n e^{−u}withu = n(n − 1)/(2k), by1 − x ≤ e^{−x}. u e^{−u} ≤ e^{−1} < 3/8gives(n − 1) n² e^{−u} = 2nk · u e^{−u} ≤ (3/4) nk ≤ (n − 1) kforn ≥ 4, son² e^{−u} ≤ k.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
The answer would change if n² were replaced by (n + 1)² (then (n, k) = (1, 1)
fails) or if the normalisation 1/k were weakened to 1/(k − 1) (then
(n, k) = (2, 2) fails).
Evidence
Evidence to collect
Exact integer arithmetic for k ≤ 400 (issue #11361): no violation; equality
exactly at (n, k) = (1, 1) and (2, 2).
The canonical source is
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/FallingFactorialMomentBound.lean. Its public
declarations are claim and result. The frozen module state has statement
identity
sha256:560d12f0ba35877aa655038e89219766a30b81a6ef2c9aaeabf9ea01e7fb8146.
The result declaration has statement identity
sha256:dd1798e2998f5227f1b0b00414c60259bb5a01d7333a8574e2bb4c4cb5d2ca5e.
The Freeze event is
sha256:48a6fb42b5ad979fbccd6499ef55c482326a4b285c2118175f2d87ba8c988da7
and has no project-level frozen prerequisites. The proof uses only the standard
axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; no sorry,
native_decide, or new axiom.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named conjecture, preregistered in issue #11361 before any
Lean. theorem; resolution proved. The public theorem has
proof_shape: content: the case split, the product bound and the one-variable
bound are proved in the module. Its escape witness is form (2), the conclusion
itself produced by these estimates, and its admission basis is
open-problem-resolution. Utility none: the inequality is
proved for all k and n.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The bounded literature check does not establish exhaustive worldwide novelty, priority, or the absence of an independent answer. The Lean kernel does not authenticate the external source or its version history.