RESEARCH / Focused target
A closed form for the generalized Stirling numbers of boson ordering
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/Quantum/FockSpace/BosonOrderingStirlingClosedForm.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
Maier uses the Hsu–Shiue generalized Stirling numbers to express orderings
of boson creation and annihilation operators. With
(y)^{n, α} = y(y − α) ⋯ (y − (n − 1)α), the rescaled numbers
Ŝ_{n,k}(α, β; r), 0 ≤ k ≤ n, are defined by
(βx + r)^{n, α} = Σ_k Ŝ_{n,k}(α, β; r) C(x, k), equivalently (Theorem 4.1)
Ŝ_{n,k} = Σ_{x=0}^{k} (−1)^{k−x} C(k, x) (βx + r)^{n, α}. Conjecture 5.3 of
arXiv:2308.10332v4 states, as found heuristically:
For all r ∈ ℤ, Ŝ_{n,k}(−1, 2; r) = Σ_{j=⌊(2−r)/2⌋}^{⌊(n+2−r)/2⌋} C(n − j, n − k) n! C(n + 1, 2j + r − 1).
The source remarks that the upper argument n − j may be negative. Issue
#10170 fixes the readings: n, k ∈ ℕ with k ≤ n, r ∈ ℤ; Ŝ is the
finite sum of Theorem 4.1 with the rising factorial; C(n − j, n − k) is the
generalized binomial coefficient Ring.choose; the sum runs over integers j
between the stated floors.
Motivation
Our foothold
The numbers Ŝ_{n,k}(−1, 2; r) enter the ordering identities of §6 of the
source. The frozen declaration
D5/S3/Quantum/FockSpace/BosonOrderingStirlingClosedForm.result proves the
conjectured closed form for every n, every k ≤ n and every integer r.
Gap
Missing bridges
Issue #10170 preregisters the conjecture and its literature check. arXiv lists version 4 (2024-02-09) with the journal reference Adv. in Appl. Math. 156 (2024) 102678. Semantic Scholar reports two citing papers: a paper on squeezing in mesoscopic circuits, and arXiv:2508.13094 by the same author, whose source cites only Theorem 6.5 of the paper.
These readings are not-found-in-searched-scope; they do not establish an
exhaustive worldwide literature search, priority, or the absence of an
independent proof.
Route
Proposed approach
Extend the sum to all integers j; outside the stated range the factor
C(n + 1, 2j + r − 1) vanishes. Write L(n, k, r) for the left side and
R(n, k, r) for the sum divided by n!.
- (K)
L(n, k + 1, r) = L(n, k, r + 2) − L(n, k, r), because the forward difference inxcommutes with the shiftx ↦ x + 1, which replacesrbyr + 2. The same holds forRwhenk < n: shiftingjby one and Pascal's ruleC(a + 1, b + 1) = C(a, b) + C(a, b + 1)for the generalized binomial coefficient giveR(n, k, r + 2) − R(n, k, r) = R(n, k + 1, r). - (R) At
k = 0,L(n, 0, r) = r(r + 1) ⋯ (r + n − 1), andL(n + 1, 0, r) − L(n + 1, 0, r − 1) = (n + 1) L(n, 0, r). Pascal's rule forC(n + 2, ·), a shift ofjand Pascal's rule for the generalized binomial coefficient giveR(n + 1, 0, r) − R(n + 1, 0, r − 1) = R(n, 0, r). - At
r = 1,L(n, 0, 1) = n!andR(n, 0, 1) = 1, because onlyj = 0contributes; soL(n, 0, 1) = n! R(n, 0, 1). Induction onn, with an integer induction onrfromr = 1, gives the casek = 0; forn = 0,R(0, 0, r) = 1because exactly onejhas2j + r − 1 ∈ {0, 1}. Induction onkusing (K) gives everyk ≤ n.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
The identity fails if the first binomial coefficient is read as zero for a
negative upper argument: at (n, k, r) = (1, 1, −1) the left side is 2
while that reading of the right side gives 1. The source's remark that the
upper argument may be negative fixes the generalized reading.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
Exact integer computation confirms the identity with the generalized binomial
coefficient for n ≤ 10, 0 ≤ k ≤ n, |r| ≤ 25 (3366 cases), and finds 1276
failures in the same range under the zero-for-negative-upper-argument reading.
The first rows at r = 0 are 1; 0, 2; 0, 6, 8; 0, 24, 72, 48;
0, 120, 600, 864, 384.
The canonical source is
D5/S3/Quantum/FockSpace/BosonOrderingStirlingClosedForm.lean. Its public
declarations are stirlingHat, conjectureSum, claim, and result; fB
and B are private non-proposition definitions. The binomial coefficient with an
integer lower index is the shared D5/S0/Conventions/IntegerIndexBinomial.binom. The frozen module state
has statement identity
sha256:d4147b129fcc7eee06209fce5e10b131b8f22ed69429327ecf75b7449790e19a.
The result declaration has statement identity
sha256:297d337df538c5c402555676c2199e22ec0e82a59ad18bbb66bd1b12ac7d72c2.
The Freeze event is
sha256:00e6e18e6b7a732583f48bdfaa03e7546f7d31655d05d9212a1ae1d711c8af94
and its project-level frozen prerequisite is
D5/S0/Conventions/IntegerIndexBinomial. The proof uses only the
standard axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; no sorry,
native_decide, or new axiom.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named conjecture, preregistered in issue #10170 before the
probe. theorem; resolution proved under the generalized-binomial reading.
The public theorem has proof_shape: content: the recursions (K) and (R) for
the conjectured sum and the layered induction are new propositions on the
live proof path, not instances of pinned lemmas. Its escape witness is form
(2), the public conclusion itself, and its admission basis is
open-problem-resolution. Utility none: it is a theorem for every n, k
and r.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Whether the journal version keeps the conjecture and its number was not checked. The bounded literature check does not establish exhaustive worldwide novelty, priority, or the absence of an independent proof. The Lean kernel does not authenticate the external source or its version history.