RESEARCH / Focused target
Cubic Grover walks cannot have twice an odd period
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/Quantum/Dynamics/CubicGroverTwiceOddPeriod.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
S. Kubota, H. Sekido and K. Yoshino, Regular graphs to induce even periodic Grover walks, arXiv:2307.13227v1, Discrete Mathematics 348 (2025) 114345, ask after Theorem 4.10:
Question 4.11. Let l be an odd integer that is a multiple of 3. Do 2l-periodic 3-regular graphs exist?
Graphs have the scope of §2.1: finite, simple, connected and undirected.
An arc is an ordered adjacent pair, represented by Mathlib's G.Dart;
its origin, terminus and reversal are a.fst, a.snd and a.symm.
Section 2.2 defines the complex Grover matrix by
$$ U_{a,b}=\begin{cases} 2/\deg_G(t(b))-1 & a=b^{-1},\ 2/\deg_G(t(b)) & t(b)=o(a),\ a\ne b^{-1},\ 0 & t(b)\ne o(a). \end{cases} $$
The period is the least positive integer $\tau$ with $U^\tau=I$.
The precise claim in issue #12338 uses $l\in\mathbb N$, Odd l,
3 ∣ l, a finite vertex type, connectedness, degree three at every
vertex, and the negation of period $2l$. Oddness already excludes zero;
the natural-number formulation preserves the source's positive periods.
Motivation
Our foothold
The frozen declaration
D5/S3/Quantum/Dynamics/CubicGroverTwiceOddPeriod.result answers this
question negatively. The obstruction acts on the exact arc evolution
matrix; it requires neither a spectral classification nor a restricted
family of graphs.
Gap
Missing bridges
Issue #12338 preregisters a Tier 1 published question and the bounded
literature check. Its orchestrator-reported check covers the source,
the citing works arXiv:2609.08315, 2607.14797, 2605.02254, 2508.09711,
2506.07439 and 2502.10217, the integral-regular classification in
arXiv:2405.01020, and MathDB queries. The reported conclusion is
not-found-in-searched-scope for a general answer. The six-periodic
classification addresses $l=3$ separately. These readings do not
establish worldwide priority or exclude an independent solution.
Route
Proposed approach
For a cubic graph let $W=3U$, an integer matrix, and $X=W^2$. Modulo two, $W$ is the arc-reversal permutation matrix, so $X\equiv I$. For each arc $a$, the unique arc contributing to the diagonal of $W^2$ is $a^{-1}$, and $X_{a,a}=1$.
Assume $U^{2l}=I$ with $l$ odd. Then $X^l=(9I)^l$. Define
$$ Q=\sum_{i=0}^{l-1}X^i(9I)^{l-1-i}. $$
The difference-of-powers identity gives $(X-9I)Q=0$. Reduction modulo two gives $Q\equiv lI\equiv I$; hence its determinant reduces to one and is nonzero over the integers. Multiplying by the adjugate and cancelling the nonzero determinant gives $X=9I$. Connectedness provides a vertex, and degree three provides an incident arc. Its diagonal then gives $1=9$, a contradiction.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A finite simple connected cubic graph with the displayed Grover matrix
and a positive odd $l$ satisfying $U^{2l}=I$ would falsify the stronger
local conclusion proved inside result. The theorem excludes every
such realization. A different evolution operator or an even $l$
changes the target.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The mathematical source is
D5/S3/Quantum/Dynamics/CubicGroverTwiceOddPeriod.lean.
Its public declarations are exactly grover, IsPeriodOf, claim
and the settling theorem result : claim. Its only private definition
is the integer numerator; all intermediate propositions are local
haves. It directly uses Mathlib's darts, endpoints, reversal and
matrix row reindexing.
The live local fact heq establishes the conditional rigidity
numerator G ^ 2 = 9 under cubic regularity, Odd l and
grover G ^ (2 * l) = 1. Its proof uses the modulo-two reduction of
the difference-of-powers factor and determinant cancellation, and its
diagonal evaluation is used in the final contradiction. The axiom
closure of result is exactly propext, Classical.choice and
Quot.sound.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 published question; resolution Proved by
D5/S3/Quantum/Dynamics/CubicGroverTwiceOddPeriod.result.
proof_shape: content; admission_basis: open-problem-resolution
(issue #12338, witness v2). Utility none: this is a general theorem,
with no retained finite graph certificate, bounded enumeration,
numerical reduction or checker implementation.
What the settlement shows
- Proved in this module: the local fact
strongerproves $U^{2l}\ne I$ for every odd $l$, without assuming $3\mid l$. The public result preserves the exact preregistered statement. - Proved in this module: the decisive mechanism is the conditional rigidity $W^2=9I$ and the incompatible diagonal $1$. Connectedness supplies a vertex; cubic degree supplies an arc. No eigenvalue or integrality hypothesis is imposed on the graph.
- Open (Lean formalization); written observation: for every odd regular degree $k\ge3$ the same construction uses $W=kU$, $W\equiv S\pmod2$ and $(W^2)_{a,a}=(2-k)^2$. The odd determinant argument would force $W^2=k^2I$, whereas $(2-k)^2-k^2=4(1-k)\ne0$. This extension is not a declaration or a proved result of this module.
- Open (Lean formalization); written consequence using the source: Theorem 4.10 allows a regular graph of period $2l$ only to be $C_{2l}$ or to be cubic with $3\mid l$. The settling result excludes the cubic alternative. Together with the source's cycle-period result this leaves only $C_{2l}$ for odd $l\ge3$. Theorem 4.10 and that classification are literature inputs, not formalized here.
- Open (independent literature verification in this delivery): issue #12338 reports that Kubota's six-periodic classification, arXiv:2609.08315, excludes cubic graphs and therefore answers $l=3$. This is an orchestrator-reported special case, not a second result proved by this module.
- Open: the source's questions for periods divisible by four are outside the odd-$l$ obstruction. The proof supplies no classification in that regime; the source's period-four $K_{3,3}$ is compatible with this answer. The source's already proved necessary conditions remain usable; its unresolved cubic alternative is excluded.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Worldwide priority and exhaustive literature coverage are not verified. The literature search in #12338 is attributed to the orchestrator; the published definitions and Question 4.11 are the source for the statement echo. The Lean kernel verifies the encoded theorem, not the exhaustiveness of that literature search. The odd-degree extension and the combined regular-graph classification are written consequences outside this module's formal declarations.