RESEARCH / Focused target
Koprowski–Lewis Conjecture 3.1: the original masked hypermatrix count
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (6)
- Scalar fiber actionReleased anchor
- Exact cell cardinalityReleased anchor
- Explicit factors and scalar fibersReleased anchor
- Constructive southeast Bruhat factorsReleased anchor
- Actual tensor count and the weighted cell sumReleased anchor
- Original masked nondegenerate hypermatrix countReleased anchor
Problem
The question
For every finite field F of cardinality q, every positive integer k, and
nonincreasing nonnegative masks lambda, mu : Fin k -> Nat satisfying
mu j <= lambda j, lambda j <= k - j, and mu j < k - j, count the pairs of
actual (k+1) x k matrices (M1, M2) that respect the two zero regions and
are nondegenerate. The source's nondegeneracy condition is the nonvanishing of
Cayley's second hyperdeterminant; equivalently, every nonzero linear
combination of the two faces has rank k over the algebraic closure.
The resolved formula is
q^(k*k) * (q-1)^(2*k)
* product (q-bracket (k+1-j-lambda j))
* product (q-bracket (k-j-mu j)),
where the products range over j : Fin k and
[r]_q = sum_{e=0}^{r-1} q^e. The count is over the literal matrix-pair
subtype, with no count, bijection, inverse, normalization, or rational-combination
premise added.
Motivation
Our foothold
Koprowski and Lewis state this as Conjecture 3.1 in Enumeration of
Nondegenerate 2 x (k+1) x k Hypermatrices, arXiv:2602.22129v1. Issue #12542
preregistered the exact assertion and its positive-k, characteristic-two
boundary. The repository's library note records the source's orbit, Bruhat,
triangular-invariance, algebraic-closure rank, and augmented-cell bridges.
Gap
Missing bridges
The source leaves the arbitrary two-mask weighted factorization as a conjectural task. The bounded repository, pinned Mathlib, admissible third-party Lean ecosystem, and the cited source search supplied no exact dominating settlement. This is a bounded search statement and does not assert worldwide absence or priority.
Route
Proposed approach
MaskedFacesDefs defines the literal faces, mask predicate, coefficient matrix
and integral coefficient polynomial. LiteralMaskedCellCount eliminates the
coefficient-one variables and counts the literal cell solutions. PencilParameterFibers
proves the algebraic-closure rank normalization and scalar-fiber classification.
SoutheastFactorization gives the constructive upper-pivot factorization and
uniqueness. MaskedTensorWeightedReduction builds the actual parameter
bijection and weighted scalar cancellation. MaskedHypermatrixCount.result
combines these with the finite-field count and the original prefactor.
The coefficient polynomial is the exact ordinary-monomial determinant specification used by the source. The identification with the geometric hyperdeterminant is cited literature evidence; it is not asserted as a new Lean identity.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A finite field, positive k, and admissible pair of masks for which the literal
matrix-pair subtype has a different cardinality would refute the result. A
purported counterexample must use the algebraic-closure rank condition, the
source zero regions, and the displayed q-bracket factors; testing only
rational combinations or changing the determinant defines a different claim.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The canonical Lean report is bound to source report SHA-256
98056832a4299f7c57cf8c05b6dc275dd7428e3bf80cb9ea3c9e02e2c2349ccb. It records
D5.S3.Combinatorics.Hypermatrix.MaskedHypermatrixCount.result with statement
ID sha256:65685a267aa57019de4ca8ea460d33f767a76962c3219c4d02a45a2ddf7c2c28
and axiom closure Classical.choice, Quot.sound, and propext; no sorry
or private axiom is part of the result. The six canonical frozen members are
the state pins under Golden/Frozen/state/D5/S3/Combinatorics/Hypermatrix/.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named open problem; admission_basis: open-problem-resolution
through preregistration #12542. The computational use is none.
| Declaration | proof_shape | admission_basis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Definitions in MaskedFacesDefs | N/A | N/A |
| literal_cell_count_original_masks | content | escape-witness |
| pencil_parameter_fibers | content | escape-witness |
| southeast_factorization | content | escape-witness |
| masked_tensor_weighted_reduction | content | escape-witness |
| MaskedHypermatrixCount.result | content | open-problem-resolution |
The support results contain live constructive elimination, rank, factorization,
and parameter-cancellation steps. The public result is the complete universal
enumeration, including k=1 and characteristic two; special boards are not
used as a substitute for the original quantifiers.
Proved mechanism. The weighted eligible-permutation sum admits a
first-column deletion and reconstruction with two finite digit coordinates.
For first-column bounds L+1 and B, its weight splits into the tail weight
and the two digit weights. Summing the digits contributes
[L+1]_q [B]_q; induction gives the displayed product for arbitrary
admissible masks. Coefficient-one elimination counts the literal field
solutions, while the scalar fiber of size q-1 cancels one triangular-group
factor. Together these give the original prefactor and the count of actual
matrix pairs, rather than only the permutation sum. The coefficient
determinant/rank bridge is proved internally, including k=1 and
characteristic two; its geometric hyperdeterminant identification retains
the literature boundary stated in Route.
Proved consequence and source boundary. This factors the general weighted sum left unresolved in the source's Section 5.1 and, through its Corollary 4.19 count bridge, supplies the arbitrary-two-mask formula of Conjecture 3.1. The source's proved special families and unweighted hyperrook count remain published results; this settlement does not replace their proofs or settle other questions in the paper. No independently verified dependency of a further source conjecture is asserted here.
Unresolved extensions. Dropping antitonicity or either mask bound, replacing finite fields by rings, and counting degenerate tensors require separate statements and proofs. The current count is an equality, so no separate estimate-sharpness claim is needed. The digit recurrence is a candidate method for other weighted board counts, but no such extension is claimed. Any new candidate requires its own source search, admission and formalization; it is not covered by this problem's resolution claim.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The literature and priority assessment is limited to the cited source, its linked version, the repository library note, and the bounded searches recorded above. The geometric hyperdeterminant correspondence is not a kernel theorem of this module. No claim is made about later unpublished work or an exhaustive global search.