RESEARCH / Focused target
Coefficientwise log-concavity and log-convexity of Catalan-power series
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (2)
- D5/S3/Analytic/KarpZhangCatalanPower/Result.claimAbsent from this graph
- D5/S3/Analytic/KarpZhangCatalanPower/Result.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
Dmitrii Karp and Yi Zhang, Log-concavity and log-convexity of series containing multiple Pochhammer symbols, arXiv:2305.09029v3, page 8, Conjecture 4.2:
Assume that ${h_k}_{k=0}^{\infty}$ is log-concave (log-convex ) and independent of $\mu$. Then the function $\mu\to h(\mu;x)$ defined in (15) is coefficient-wise log-concave (log-convex ).
Formula (15) defines
$$ h(t;x)=\sum_{k\ge0}h_k a_k(t)x^k,\qquad a_k(t)=\frac{(t)_{2k}}{(t+1)_k k!}. $$
Definition 1.1, page 2, starts with a nonnegative nontrivial real sequence. The log-concave class has $h_k^2\ge h_{k-1}h_{k+1}$ for every positive integer $k$ and interval support, with the precise printed zero-support disjunction. The log-convex clause reads:
If $f_k^2\le f_{k-1}f_{k+1}$ for all $k\in\mathbb N$, the sequence is called log-convex (this inequality implies that a nontrivial sequence is strictly positive).
Here $\mathbb N={1,2,\ldots}$. The literal inequalities permit the exception supported on ${0}$; no extra strict-positivity assumption is imposed. For $\mu,\alpha,\beta\ge0$, set
$$ \delta_m=\sum_{k=0}^{m}h_kh_{m-k} \left[a_k(\mu+\alpha)a_{m-k}(\mu+\beta) -a_k(\mu)a_{m-k}(\mu+\alpha+\beta)\right]. $$
The assertion is $\delta_m\ge0$ for log-concave $h$ and $\delta_m\le0$ for log-convex $h$, for every natural degree $m$ and every nonnegative real base parameter and shifts. It concerns finite formal coefficients, without convergence or growth assumptions.
All Lean names in the table have prefix D5.S3.Analytic.
| Source object | Lean name | Correspondence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Formula (15) | KarpZhangCatalanPower.Coeff.a | Literal rising-factorial quotient, including $k!$. |
| Definition 1.1, log-concave class | KarpZhangReciprocal.Result.IsLogConcave | Existing predicate, including nontriviality and exact interval support. |
| Definition 1.1, log-convex class | KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result.IsLogConvex | Nonnegativity, nontriviality and adjacent inequalities at positive indices; no support restriction. |
| Turanian coefficient | KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result.delta | Exactly the finite Cauchy sum above. |
| Conjecture 4.2 | KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result.claim | Both implications for the same $h,\mu,\alpha,\beta,m$. |
| Settlement | KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result.result | A proof of exactly claim. |
Motivation
Our foothold
The index law makes the unweighted transform log-neutral. The conjecture asks whether weighting by either sequence class preserves the corresponding coefficient sign for arbitrary real shifts. Positivity of the evaluated series, integer-shift cases or finitely many degrees would not settle it.
Gap
Missing bridges
Status: PROVED (Lean) for both halves, including $\mu=0$. There is no degree cutoff, no integrality restriction on the shifts, and no additional positivity assumption on the log-convex sequence. Conjecture 3.8 is outside this assertion.
Route
Proposed approach
Write $a_0(t)=1$ and, for $n\ge1$,
$$ a_n(t)=\frac{t}{n!}\prod_{r=n+1}^{2n-1}(t+r). $$
These are the coefficients of the Catalan series power $C(x)^t$. Their convolution index law and its derivative at zero give
$$ \sum_{k=0}^m a_k(s)a_{m-k}(t)=a_m(s+t),\qquad a_n'(t)=\sum_{j=1}^n b_j a_{n-j}(t),\qquad b_j=\frac{\binom{2j}{j}}{2j}>0. $$
For $0<u<v$ and $i<l$, the adjacent-ratio comparison gives $a_i(u)a_l(v)>a_l(u)a_i(v)$ (TP2). Put
$$ Z_{m,q}(u,v)=\sum_{k=q}^{m-q}a_k(u)a_{m-k}(v). $$
Differentiating along $u+v=S$ and cancelling reflected overlapping intervals leaves
$$ (\partial_u-\partial_v)Z_{m,q} =\sum_{j=1}^m b_j\sum_{i\in R_{m,q,j}} \left[a_i(u)a_{m-j-i}(v)-a_{m-j-i}(u)a_i(v)\right], $$
where $R_{m,q,j}=[\max(0,q-j),\min(q-1,m-q-j)]\cap\mathbb Z$. Every surviving index satisfies $i<m-j-i$. Thus $Z$ increases towards the balanced point on a line of constant parameter sum. Symmetry gives nonnegative tails
$$ T_{m,q}=Z_{m,q}(\mu+\alpha,\mu+\beta) -Z_{m,q}(\mu,\mu+\alpha+\beta)\ge0. $$
The full tail $T_{m,0}$ is zero by the index law. At $\mu=0$ and $q\ge1$, $a_k(0)=0$ at every index in the second product, so termwise nonnegativity proves the same tail inequality.
With $H=\lfloor m/2\rfloor$ and $W_q=h_qh_{m-q}$, the existing generic Abel identity gives
$$ \delta_m=W_0T_{m,0}+\sum_{q=1}^{H}(W_q-W_{q-1})T_{m,q}. $$
The existing log-concave balancing theorem makes $W$ nondecreasing, including all interval supports and zeros. In the log-convex class, $h_1=0$ implies $h_n=0$ for every $n\ge1$, by induction in the adjacent inequalities. Otherwise nonnegativity gives $h_1>0$; its adjacent inequality forces $h_0>0$ and induction forces every subsequent entry positive. Dividing adjacent inequalities then shows that $h_{n+1}/h_n$ is nondecreasing. Therefore $W_{q+1}\le W_q$ below the middle. The zero-tail case gives the same inequality directly. Abel proves both signs and counts an even middle index once. Empty increment sums cover $m=0,1$.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A mismatch would include reversing the Turanian sign, dropping a factorial,
restricting shifts to integers, replacing interval support on the log-concave
side by adjacent inequalities alone, or assuming all log-convex entries
strictly positive. The derivative must be along constant parameter sum,
and reflected intervals with negative upper endpoints must be empty.
The settlement must prove the exact universal claim without placeholders
or additional axioms.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The source locator and quotations are in
Library/Asymptotics/karpzhang2023pochhammer.md; the printed pages are 2 and 8
of arXiv:2305.09029v3. The preregistration is
https://github.com/the-omega-institute/trureturing/issues/21083.
The coefficient, index, generator, reflected-interval and tail proofs share
D5/S3/Analytic/KarpZhangCatalanPower/Result.lean, which proves exactly
claim. The supporting declarations retain the Coeff, Index and
Interval namespaces within that module.
The sequence predicate, log-concave balancing and generic finite Abel identity
are reused from D5/S3/Analytic/KarpZhangReciprocal/Result.lean.
The paper argument is attributed by the coordinating research line to a codex-cli research seat and an independent codex-cli referee seat. The Lean implementation uses codex-cli, with Claude Opus 5.5 coordinating. This attribution is separate from the mathematical evidence.
The scoped build of D5.S3.Analytic.KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result and
D5.S3.Analytic.KarpZhangConjecture.Result checks the settlement and the
consumer closure of the shared Abel declarations. The axiom closure of
every public theorem of the Catalan-power settling module
D5.S3.Analytic.KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result is contained in
${\texttt{propext},\texttt{Classical.choice},\texttt{Quot.sound}}$.
Local compilation is distinct from freezing, publication and required CI.
No numerical computation is used as proof evidence.
Triage
Scope assessment
What the settlement shows
- PROVED (Lean): The mechanism is index law ⇒ positive derivative
generator $b_j=\binom{2j}{j}/(2j)$ ⇒ reflected-interval cancellation ⇒
balancing increases interval convolutions ⇒ nonnegative tails ⇒ Abel gives
both coefficient signs. The respective declarations are
Index.index_law,Index.b_eq_centralBinom,Index.b_pos,Interval.reflected_interval,Interval.slice_strictMonoOn,Interval.tail_nonnegandResult.result, with prefixD5.S3.Analytic.KarpZhangCatalanPower. - PROVED (Lean,
Result.result): Both implications hold for every degree, nonnegative base parameter and nonnegative real shifts. This includes zero shifts, zero entries, finite and singleton log-concave supports, and the log-convex exception supported on ${0}$. - PROVED (in prose): The sign argument generalizes to any formal family $A_t(x)=G(x)^t=\exp(tB(x))$, $G(0)=1$, with $B(x)=\log G(x)=\sum_{j\ge1}b_jx^j$ having $b_j\ge0$, whose coefficients satisfy $a_i(u)a_l(v)\ge a_l(u)a_i(v)$ for $0<u\le v$ and $i<l$. Indeed each $a_n(t)$ is a polynomial in $t$ with nonnegative coefficients, so is nonnegative for $t\ge0$. Formal differentiation gives $a_n'=\sum_{j=1}^n b_j a_{n-j}$. The reflected-interval identity above is purely finite reindexing, and every determinant on its right is nonnegative by TP2. Thus every constant-sum central convolution is nondecreasing up to its centre. Symmetry gives the tail inequality for positive base parameters, and polynomial continuity gives it at zero. The semigroup identity gives zero full tail; the same two balanced-weight inequalities and Abel give both signs. Strictness needs additional positivity and is not part of this generalization.
- OPEN: A general Lean theorem for that entire formal-family criterion; the present Lean theorem concerns the literal coefficients (15).
- OPEN: Joint log-concavity of arbitrary truncated interval convolutions is neither asserted nor needed. The proof uses only constant-sum balancing.
- OPEN: Conjecture 3.8 and any other assertion beyond the exact
claim. The settlement removes the shift restrictions for Conjecture 4.2; it does not prove a one-sign-change property of the paper's paired kernel.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Exhaustive literature coverage, citation-index completeness and priority
are unverified. The source and literature checks supplied in the
preregistration are coordinating-line evidence, not a new online search
by this offline implementation seat. The producer attribution is supplied
by that line. Four-slot escape registrations for the newly authored public
theorems of D5.S3.Analytic.KarpZhangCatalanPower.Result are not completed;
their proofs do not constitute those registrations. This audit boundary is associated with
preregistration #21083 and requires the corresponding owner registrations.