RESEARCH / Focused target
Paired three-adic valuations
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/Arith/Congruence/BalaA363412Valuation.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
$v_3(b(3n))=v_3(b(3n-1))$ for every $n\in\mathbb N$ with $n\ge1$.
Here $a(n)$ and $b(n)$ are the integer coordinates of
$\prod_{k=0}^n(1+k\sqrt{-3})$.
Preregistration #18636 maps to D5.S3.Arith.Congruence.BalaA363412Valuation.result (Proved).
Motivation
Our foothold
This is an explicit OEIS conjecture in the source family documented in bala3634-valuations.md.
Gap
Missing bridges
The source and literature screen recorded in #18636 found no proof of this exact assertion in the searched scope; completeness is ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED.
Route
Proposed approach
BalaA363412.reflection_congruences states that $2b(m)-m(m+1)$ is
divisible by both $3m$ and $3(m+1)$. At $m=3n$ and $m=3n-1$,
BalaA363412Valuation.at_multiple and before_multiple convert these
divisibilities into factorizations of twice each imaginary coordinate as
$3n$ times an integer prime to $3$. Their helper
BalaA363412Valuation.double_factor applies padicValInt.mul to obtain
valuation $v_3(3n)$ on both sides. The primary dossier gives the four
issue-to-result mappings.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
An index or prime within the displayed domain violating the assertion would refute it.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The kernel-checked declaration is
D5.S3.Arith.Congruence.BalaA363412Valuation.result.
The axiom closure of every public declaration is contained in
{propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound}.
Triage
Scope assessment
| Item | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| $v_3(b(3n))=v_3(b(3n-1))$ for every $n\in\mathbb N$ with $n\ge1$. | proved | Kernel-checked BalaA363412Valuation.result. |
What the settlement shows
The conclusion holds throughout its stated domain. The primary dossier gives the shared mechanism and distinguishes the finite prime bound from the unbounded term indices. Broader classifications remain open there.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
Literature completeness and priority are ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED. Four-slot escape registration is unfinished in #21978; no declared_validated status is asserted.