RESEARCH / Focused target
The averaged enumerator of B-form codes
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/Quantum/Information/BFormCodeAveragedEnumerator.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
N. Angelinos, D. Chakraborty and A. Dymarsky (arXiv:2206.14825, hep-th; JHEP
11 (2022) 118) build Narain CFTs from codes over F_p × F_p. For prime p the
generating matrix is (I | B^T) with B antisymmetric mod p and B_ii = 0;
the codewords are (r, B^T r), r ∈ Z_p^c. Averaging the full enumerator
polynomial over the p^{c(c−1)/2} such B at x_ab = t_a t_b, t_a = t_{−a},
they state:
We conjecture the form of corresponding averaged enumerator polynomial based on invariance under MacWilliams identity and explicit checks for sufficiently small n and prime p
with eq. (barP):
P̄ = t_0^{2c} + (Σ_{k=0}^{p−1} (Σ_{a,b} cos(2πkab/p) t_a t_b)^c − p t_0^c (Σ_a t_a)^c) / p^c.
Issue #11296 fixes the reading: p prime, c ≥ 0, t : Z/p → ℂ even, and in
the cosine k, a, b are the representatives 0, …, p − 1.
Motivation
Our foothold
The averaged enumerator gives the averaged partition function of the code CFT
ensemble, which the paper compares with the holographic "U(1) gravity"
prediction. The frozen declaration
D5/S3/Quantum/Information/BFormCodeAveragedEnumerator.result proves eq. (barP)
for every prime p, every c and every even t.
Gap
Missing bridges
Issue #11296 preregisters the reading, the route and the literature check. The
paper has one arXiv version, and the published JHEP text states the same
conjecture with the same formula as eq. (5.5). INSPIRE lists 38 citing records; the 36 arXiv full
texts were searched and none proves eq. (barP). Dymarsky–Shapere
(arXiv:2009.01244) give the p = 2 average without a written proof.
arXiv:2310.06012 proves the average over all codes, a different ensemble. The
2024 PhD thesis of N. Angelinos was not readable.
These readings are not-found-in-searched-scope; they do not establish an
exhaustive worldwide literature search, priority, or the absence of an
independent answer.
Route
Proposed approach
- Exchange the sums over
Bandr; the termr = 0givest_0^{2c}. - For
r ≠ 0,r · B^T r = 0, andB ↦ B^T rmaps the B-form matrices ontor^⊥(a matrix supported on row and columnj, withr_j ≠ 0, reaches anys ∈ r^⊥). All fibres have the same size, so the sum overBisp^{c(c−1)/2} / p^{c−1}times the sum overs ∈ r^⊥. - Write
[r · s = 0] = p^{−1} Σ_k ψ(k r · s)with the standard additive characterψ. The sum overr, sfactors into(Σ_{a,b} ψ(kab) t_a t_b)^c; the rowr = 0givesp t_0^c (Σ_a t_a)^c. - Since
tis even,Σ_{a,b} ψ(kab) t_a t_bequals the cosine sum.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
The answer would change if the average were taken over all codes rather than
the B-form ones, or if t were not even (a non-even t at (p, c) = (3, 2)
gives 441.33 against 454.83 for the formula).
Evidence
Evidence to collect
Exact rational averages over all B and r (issue #11296) against the formula
at 50 digits, for random rational even t and
(p, c) ∈ {(2,1), (2,2), (2,3), (2,4), (3,1), (3,2), (3,3), (5,2), (5,3), (7,2)}:
the largest difference is 2.4·10⁻⁴⁸.
The canonical source is
D5/S3/Quantum/Information/BFormCodeAveragedEnumerator.lean. Its public
declarations are IsBForm, enumerator, claim and result. The frozen
module state has statement identity
sha256:d83ffc595ee5d2d3392359a50a396f6bf0162cd14d9955b003ca53e8b6554754.
The result declaration has statement identity
sha256:be58fcd358ee925fa63d598d89140a27ed7edad84adf563a3c71a13f82fd4534.
The Freeze event is
sha256:e2538d573612982b772b8d0f4edb5d1857596f24f2658c2c6b4746c610139cef
and has no project-level frozen prerequisites. The proof uses only the standard
axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound; no sorry,
native_decide, or new axiom.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named conjecture, preregistered in issue #11296 before any
Lean. theorem; resolution proved. The public theorem has
proof_shape: content: the fibre count, the count of B-form matrices, the
character expansion and the cosine reduction are proved in the module. Its
escape witness is form (2), and its admission basis is
open-problem-resolution. Utility none: the statement holds for every prime
p, every c and every even t.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The bounded literature check does not establish exhaustive worldwide novelty, priority, or the absence of an independent answer. The Lean kernel does not authenticate the external source or its version history.