RESEARCH / Focused target
Adamaszek's Conjecture 7.4 on necklace cycle lengths
RELEASED FOUNDATIONS / PROPOSED CONNECTION
Research connections
All source anchors (1)
- D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/HardCore/HardSquareNecklacePeriod.resultAbsent from this graph
Problem
The question
M. Adamaszek, Hard squares on cylinders revisited, arXiv:1202.1655v2, Section 7, Conjecture 7.4, states:
The length of every cycle in the graph Neck(k, n) divides n−3k. In other words, for every (k, n)-necklace N we have Tⁿ⁻³ᵏN = N.
The section assumes even positive circumference n and positive k. A necklace has 2k distinct stones, each with signed vector −2, −1, 1 or 2. Consecutive stones have opposite directions. Away-facing gaps are odd; toward-facing gaps plus both vector lengths are odd. A toward-facing gap is at least three, and at gap three both vectors have length one. Necklaces are identified under circle isometries. T performs simultaneous JUMP, then TURN (−2→1, −1→2, 1→−2, 2→−1), then FIX of facing gaps three by shortening length-two vectors to one. Issue #11582 fixes this reading before the probe.
Motivation
Our foothold
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/HardCore/HardSquareNecklacePeriod.result proves
that for every legal necklace N the iterate Tⁿ⁻³ᵏN equals an isometric copy of
N. The witness in the proof is a rotation. This proves the source's equivalent
return statement on the isometry classes used as the vertices of Neck(k, n).
Gap
Missing bridges
The source records experimental verification for even n≤36. The literature
check in #11582 classifies this as a tier-1 named conjecture. The five arXiv
sources among the six citing records were checked; none supplied a settlement.
The arXiv searches for hard squares, independence complexes on cylinders, and
Adamaszek necklaces, and the formal-conjectures searches, yielded no matching
settlement in their searched scope. This is not-found-in-searched-scope;
the unread citing record and MathDB limitation are retained below.
Route
Proposed approach
- Sort the occupied integer sites and extend them to positions xᵢ on ℤ, with xᵢ₊₂ₖ=xᵢ+n and periodic vectors vᵢ. The source's odd-gap rules make every gap integral, so choosing an occupied point as origin loses no isometry class.
- Compress each labelled stone to yᵢ=2xᵢ+vᵢ−3i. These positions are strictly ordered and have circumference 2L, where L=n−3k. The pair conditions imply 4k≤n and hence L>0. The compressed velocity is uᵢ=sign(vᵢ)(2|vᵢ|−3), which is either −1 or 1.
- A physical step is compressed free motion yᵢ↦yᵢ+uᵢ followed by relabelling. FIX acts exactly at disjoint crossing pairs and exchanges the compressed velocities. The integer lift represents both the original configuration and every physical iterate, including the pair across the origin.
- At time L, displacements L and −L agree modulo 2L. Strict ordering makes the resulting bijection of the integer labels a translation i↦i+r.
- Telescoping the first moment over a full label window gives r as minus the number of initial negative compressed velocities. The even physical circumference and gap parities give r≡L (mod 2), recovering the physical signs as well as the compressed velocities. This recovers each vector and translates every physical position by (L−3r)/2, a rotation modulo n.
Falsifier
What would falsify this route
A faithful proof requires the complete cyclic representation, unique incoming stones for JUMP, simultaneous FIX, preservation of the legal pair conditions, and recovery of physical signs from winding parity. A compressed-velocity argument omitting sign recovery would not establish the physical return: two different physical vectors share each compressed velocity.
Evidence
Evidence to collect
The canonical Lean source is
D5/S3/StatisticalMechanics/HardCore/HardSquareNecklacePeriod.lean.
Its only source-authored public theorem is result : claim. The definitions
retain the source's entire legal-necklace domain. Circle isometries use pinned
Mathlib DihedralGroup n; the configuration action also reverses vectors on
reflection. The proof uses no project-level frozen prerequisite, sorry,
native_decide, or new axiom. Its axiom closure is propext,
Classical.choice, and Quot.sound.
Triage
Scope assessment
Tier 1 external named conjecture from the 2012 source; preregistered in #11582
before the Lean probe. Resolution: proved. Admission basis:
open-problem-resolution. Proof shape: content, with the public result
itself produced by cyclic representation, compressed motion, winding and
parity reconstruction. Utility: none; this is a universal theorem rather
than a bounded computation or certified instance.
What the settlement shows
- Proved in this module: every legal necklace in the stated even-n, positive-k domain returns after L=n−3k steps up to rotation. The source permits both rotations and reflections; the proof needs only rotations. The period bound is a common return time and does not assert that each cycle has length exactly L.
- Proved inside the result's live proof: legal configurations admit the complete periodic integer lift, JUMP has unique inflow, T preserves legality, 4k≤n follows from consecutive-pair conditions, and compressed free motion plus winding parity recovers physical positions and signed vectors. No additional 4k≤n hypothesis is imposed on the public theorem.
- Open as further Lean obligations: extension to odd n or altered gap rules, classification of exact periods, and formal translation of the source's pattern generating functions. The parity reconstruction uses the source's even-n hypothesis; no relaxed-hypothesis result is asserted here.
- Literature consequence: Theorem 7.6 states that Conjecture 7.4 implies Conjecture 1.4; Theorem 7.5 relates generating-function denominators to necklace cycle lengths. The return theorem supplies their conjectural necklace-period input. Those source implications are not formalized in this module; no separate Lean settlement of Conjecture 1.4 is claimed.
ASSUMED-UNVERIFIED
Unverified assumptions
The non-arXiv citing record was not read in the literature check in #11582. The MathDB search was client-rendered and was not independently verified. The bounded search establishes no exhaustive worldwide novelty or priority. Kernel checking establishes the encoded theorem; source fidelity and these literature boundaries remain distinct from the proof.