Quantum / CONCEPT
The six-cycle graph state is not strongly 2-resistant
The six-cycle graph state is not strongly 2-resistant: tracing out qubits 0 and 2 leaves a convex combination of products across the cut {1} | {3,4,5}. The C5 clause of the question is not answered here.
Closed
DIRECT PREREQUISITES2
DIRECT CONSEQUENCES1
PROOF DEPTH3
DOCUMENT LINKS1
A two-qubit loss destroys genuine multipartite entanglement
RELATIONSHIP ATLAS
Every connection, in context.
Direct recorded relationships
Proof dependencyStructural affinityDocument link
Certified topology / UPSTREAM
Prerequisites
Certified topology / DOWNSTREAM
Consequences
RELATED KNOWLEDGE
Structural connections
- Finite Density States and Quantum Channelsstructural-affinity · Closed
- Full separability and exchanged diagonalsstructural-affinity · Closed
- Legacy Relative-Entropy Boundarystructural-affinity · Closed
- Local Observation Partial-Trace Equivalencestructural-affinity · Closed
- Qutrit Threshold Sharingstructural-affinity · Closed
- The complementary W-state effect is not fully separablestructural-affinity · Closed
- The five-cycle graph state is strongly 1-resistantstructural-affinity · Closed
- The negativity of randomized graph states is not monotonestructural-affinity · Closed
- The worst-case CNOT lower bound for reflection symmetrystructural-affinity · Closed
- Universal Replacement Capacity Growthstructural-affinity · Closed
Documents & exposition
Other authored & advisory relationships
None recorded in this release.
LIBRARY / RELEASE VERSIONS
Content history
Loading release versions...
Browse the archiveCertified provenance